Boris Johnsons government has a few distractions at the moment, and, though there is the occasional glimpse of official process, the Integrated Review of Security, Defence, Development & Foreign Policy that will define Brexit Britains place in the world is clearly not top of the Prime Ministers To Do list. That said, the amalgamation last month of the Foreign Office and the unloved Department for International Development into the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office does rather predispose the outcome of the development and foreign policy parts of the review. Whether this was red meat to Tory backbenchers or an arbitrary and grandstanding Cummings/Johnson intervention need not detain us because the Chief of the Defence Staff, General Sir Nick Carter, has given us a taster of what is to come and we should pay some attention to what he has said.
In a speech delivered last week at the Policy Exchange think tank, Carter outlined a world that could have been drawn from the pages of recent works by contemporary observers like Sean McFate (Goliath), David Kilcullen (The Dragons & The Snakes) or, indeed, theArticle (28 June 2019 & 21 May 2020), where the west is playing strategic catch up. Carter contends that China, drawing on atavistic wisdom, and Russia, drawing on bitter experience, have reached the same conclusion: that to fight the west aka America in conventional battle is a mugs game and that imaginative forms of engagement must be developed to transform both the battlefield and what we understand as war.
As a result, and while the wests eye was off the ball in Afghanistan and Iraq, both countries have developed sophisticated techniques to fuse all instruments of national power an incomplete list would include restrictive trade practices, economic entryism, terrorism, cyberwar, lawfare and fake news to contest simultaneously the physical, virtual and cognitive realms of global engagement in a state of intense competition, short of war. The aim is to always seek marginal tactical advantage which, when taken in aggregate, can produce a strategic outcome.
Central to this view of conflict is the concept of a threshold. Above the threshold exists war in a conventional sense, where advantage still lies with the west and is a place our competitors have no wish to go, at least for now. The threshold itself is constantly, but prudently, tested to explore the boundaries of western tolerance. Below the threshold lies a Hobbesian world of perpetual, insidious and ambivalent conflict where surrogates dispense physical violence, trolls and hackers dispense digital violence, state policies like the Chinese Belt and Road initiative offer economic entrapment and there is an unending battle for narrative dominance.
China and Russia have two significant advantages in operating in this new environment. First, they have built the doctrine from the bottom up rather than having to adapt existing conventional structures; it is a custom build rather than a clumsy modification of an existing design. And second, all powerful state bureaucracies have the inherent advantage of being able to direct organs of both the state and civil society with far greater facility than checked and balanced western democracies. The examples of China and Huawei or Russia and the Wagner Group (a private security company essentially mercenaries widely deployed in Syria and elsewhere) make this clear. Late to the party but at least aware of these tectonic shifts in the nature of conflict, the British government has published its own Fusion Doctrine guidelines, but they remain very much aspirational targets rather than a functioning model.
Why has fusion become such a dominant theme? The answer is that it has been dominant since the 4th Century BC but the elements that now need to be fused are more numerous and more disparate. Alexanders army became invincible because it combined in mutually supporting manoeuvre the Companion Cavalry, the heavy infantry phalanx and the light infantry Agrianian skirmishers. In the same way, the Napoleonic system of independent corps manoeuvre or the manner in which the British in 1918 finally cracked industrial warfare by coordinating the infantry, artillery and aviation combat arms with logistic agility are illustrations of the fusion challenges of their day. Today, we are adequate practitioners of joint warfare the ability to operate in the traditional domains of land, sea and air complemented with a limited capacity to operate in the cyber and space domains. But we are way off the pace in combining that with other instruments of national power to create a fully fused effect; at the moment, our opponents possess a decisive advantage.
So what are the chances of closing the gap and is it worth the effort? The very fact that the Chief of Defence Staff can offer such an acute summary of the terms of strategic engagement is a good sign, but he and his fellow Whitehall principals have at least three fundamental challenges to meet as they try to address security fusion.
The first is that the machinery of government will need to be completely transformed to accommodate fusion. The existing state architecture has reasonably functioning military, cyber-security and intelligence silos but no mechanism to link the highest level of the executive function of government with each of these independent capabilities, along with the host of other instruments that exist in civil society as well as under state control.
Shaking up Whitehall is clearly a task this government is pursuing with missionary zeal, but this transformation is several orders of magnitude beyond the sacking of a handful of permanent secretaries. It is possible to create real strategic fusion, as the evidence of the world wars of the 20th Century attests. We did not outfight Germany twice between 1914 and 1945 but we did make a better fist of industrial production, scientific research, the coordination of intelligence and the creation of alliances: strategy trumps tactics and strategy is fusions child. Whether this historic vocation for creating fused effect in wars of national survival can be transferred to the less compelling circumstances of permanent sub-threshold conflict remains to be seen; certainly, this governments response to the current strategic threat of Covid-19 does little to inspire confidence.
The second challenge is one of transition. As has already been observed, China and Russia conceived a doctrine and then built the capabilities to prosecute it. By contrast, we have sets of existing capabilities to which we are trying to retro-fit a doctrine. The danger here is that in replacing old metal stuff with new digital stuff we fall between the two stools and create capabilities that are unable to properly discharge the functions of either traditional warfare or 21st Century conflict.
The final challenge is to address the scandalous legacy of recent defence procurement that has left Britain barely capable of meeting traditional security assumptions, let alone taking on a radical new construct. Two examples will suffice to make the point. The British armys capacity to fight on a high intensity battlefield is based around its main battle tank Challenger 2 and its infantry fighting vehicle, Warrior. It has been clear for the last two decades that Challenger 2 is clapped out, and, more recently, that Warrior has been worked to death in Afghanistan and Iraq. Yet, despite 430m spent on scoping a Warrior replacement alone, the British army has neither a main battle tank or an infantry fighting vehicle that it can go confidently to war with today, and with no replacements in sight. So, when there is speculation in the press that the army may abandon tanks altogether, it is less an imaginative doctrinal leap than an admission of material realism.
While the army has failed in procurement terms, the Royal Navy has been recklessly successful. Reckless in the sense that its main capital platforms the Queen Elizabeth class aircraft carriers and the future Dreadnought class of Trident missile carrying submarines have bent the procurement programme completely out of shape and produced surface ships that would not survive a real fight and a one shot nuclear deterrent completely reliant on the improbable assumption that technology will not be able to render the oceans transparent during the 50-year operating life of the platforms. Cleaning the Augean Stables of defence procurement would be the lifes work of any Chief of Defence Staff, Defence Secretary or Prime Ministerial advisor.
What emerges from the cursory review is that a series of procedural and material hurdles stand between where we are today and where the Chief of Defence Staff wants us to be, but even that observation does not address the core issue: is it actually worth the effort? Against a background of disintegrating public finances and the competing claims of health, social care and economic regeneration why not abandon the delusion of the global big league and just settle for a contribution to Nato, policing our fishing grounds and dispensing some developmental largesse? That, of course, would fail the manifest destiny of Global Britain but it is a discussion that must be taking place somewhere in Whitehall, right now.
See the original post:
Somewhere in Whitehall a defence review is taking place - TheArticle
- The Best TVs From Top Brands, Including Samsung, LG, Sony And More - Forbes - August 9th, 2022
- Review: SONDHEIM ON SONDHEIM at Cain Park--Alma Theatre - Broadway World - August 9th, 2022
- 7 Alternate Ways To Starting A Family That Need To Be Normalised - Hauterrfly - August 9th, 2022
- 10 great action movies to watch that follow the John Wick mold - Polygon - August 9th, 2022
- An interview with Joel Angel Bravo Anduaga: Are international organizations still relevant? - Modern Diplomacy - August 9th, 2022
- How Raised By Wolves used revolutionary 3D printing in its special effects - Winter is Coming - August 9th, 2022
- To win the U.S. Senate election, Kansas Democrats say they need to 'get more personal' - KCUR - August 9th, 2022
- The pillars of health: influence of multiple lifestyle behaviors on body mass index and depressive symptoms in adult twins - BMC Public Health - BMC... - August 9th, 2022
- Canine hypoadrenocorticism: Part II - PMC - July 7th, 2022
- Surrogacy Market Share Will Continue To Expand Steadily Through 2030 Designer Women - Designer Women - July 7th, 2022
- The new rules to keep advertisements in check - The Hindu - July 7th, 2022
- Patient-reported outcome measures should not be the primary outcome in glaucoma clinical trials of disease modification - British Journal of... - July 7th, 2022
- 2023 Employer Health and Benefit Strategies Focused on Affordability and Access, Mercer Survey - Yahoo Finance - July 7th, 2022
- The Irony of Misinformation: USIA Myths Block Enduring Solutions - 19FortyFive - July 7th, 2022
- Associations between long-term drought and diarrhea among children under five in low- and middle-income countries - Nature.com - July 7th, 2022
- Paradox of Buhari and the Nigerian conundrum - By: . - Daily Trust - June 15th, 2022
- Putting the brakes on accelerated approval won't improve healthcare PharmaLive - PharmaLive - June 15th, 2022
- Certain offshore online gambling companies involved in tax evasion: All India Gaming Federation - Business Today - June 15th, 2022
- With focus on kids, govt curbs misleading ads; prohibits surrogate advertisements - The Indian Express - June 15th, 2022
- Pakistan: An Army-Imposed Deal with the Pakistani Taliban Could Spell Disaster - The Wire - June 15th, 2022
- Ruth Institute's 5th Annual Summit will address effects of the Sexual Revolution - Catholic World Report - June 15th, 2022
- Trump knew he lost election but he pushed nuts fraud claims anyway - The Independent - June 15th, 2022
- 20 Years Ago: The Bourne Identity Stood Against the Grain - Tilt Magazine - June 15th, 2022
- From the Archives: Regos Girls - ARTnews - June 15th, 2022
- Best Surrogacy Agency in UK for Surrogacy Support in UK and US - May 18th, 2022
- Lacunae in the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021 TheLeaflet - The Leaflet - May 18th, 2022
- Nuclearization Of South Asia And Emerging Threats OpEd - Eurasia Review - May 18th, 2022
- Jubilation, heartbreak in the Philippines after Marcos Jrs landslide win - TRT World - May 18th, 2022
- Silence the Voices of Hatred: N.Y. Governor Hochul Uses the Buffalo Massacre to Renew Calls for Censorship of Social Media - Jonathan Turley - May 18th, 2022
- Pregnancy Takes 9 Months But This Man Waited 3 Years To Become A Single Father Through Surrogacy - Bored Panda - April 9th, 2022
- Grammys 2022: FashionLive From the Red Carpet - Verve Times - April 9th, 2022
- Alternative Ways to Seek Regional and Global Influence: How Shadowy Organizations Serve the Interests of Turkey, Iran, and Russia - smallwarsjournal - April 9th, 2022
- Best Breaking Benjamin Songs: 15 Tunes That Define the Band - uDiscover Music - April 9th, 2022
- As Priyanka Chopra Jonas welcomes her baby through surrogacy, here is what it means and why families opt for it | The Times of India - Times of India - January 25th, 2022
- Is there anything normal about relations with Turkey? - Armenian Weekly - January 25th, 2022
- A look at the voters who could decide the Virginia governor's race - Business Insider - November 4th, 2021
- Meet the cast of PARENTAL GUIDANCE 2021 - TV Blackbox - November 4th, 2021
- Parental Guidance: Everything you need to know about the families - Mediaweek - November 4th, 2021
- Surrogacy And The Creation Of The Modern Family - Family and Matrimonial - UK - Mondaq News Alerts - July 29th, 2021
- The surrogacy pathway: surrogacy and the legal process for intended parents and surrogates in England and Wales - GOV.UK - July 29th, 2021
- Care in surrogacy: guidance for the care of surrogates and intended parents in surrogate births in England and Wales - GOV.UK - July 29th, 2021
- Revitalizing MSME financing: COVID and beyond - Economic Times - July 29th, 2021
- Here are some of the bills that passed the 2021 Legislature - Las Vegas Review-Journal - June 3rd, 2021
- Why banks need to adopt white label lending platforms - Elets - June 3rd, 2021
- 6 Things New York Attorneys Need To Know About The New Surrogacy Law - Above the Law - February 16th, 2021
- Is Scarlet Witch Really In Control? Every Theory | Screen Rant - Screen Rant - February 11th, 2021
- The third wave that pushed Irish hospitals to the brink - RTE.ie - February 11th, 2021
- Candidates, Experts Discuss Potential Positives and Pitfalls of Ranked-Choice Voting Amid New York City Implementation - Gotham Gazette - February 4th, 2021
- One Year Of Fight Against Coronavirus, Has India Passed Its Peak? What To Expect Now, Dr Randeep Guleria Explains | Coronavirus Outbreak - Swachh... - February 4th, 2021
- Surrogacy reform is spreading in the rich world - The Economist - January 31st, 2021
- As teams prepare for Super Bowl Sunday, CDC says NFL's COVID-19 mitigation strategies are effective - Yahoo! Voices - January 31st, 2021
- The unregulated, All-Star-driven world of open enrollment loopholes in Texas high school football - The Dallas Morning News - January 15th, 2021
- The Twitter presidency is over. Or is it? - Vox.com - January 15th, 2021
- Peaceful transition of power is the American dream right now - Modern Diplomacy - December 28th, 2020
- News industry must seize opportunity restore trust | TheHill - The Hill - December 18th, 2020
- The GOP Hopes This Issue Will Tarnish Warnock's Pastor Image - The Daily Beast - December 18th, 2020
- The real US failure when it comes to globalization is not having a 21st century, social safety net - The Times of India Blog - December 18th, 2020
- Prevent your guacamole from browning with this airtight container - Yahoo! Voices - December 18th, 2020
- How Trump Won One of America's Most Diverse Counties By a Lot - POLITICO - December 14th, 2020
- Gwen Stefani and Blake Shelton holding off on wedding due to COVID-19 - Yahoo News Canada - December 14th, 2020
- Trump May Be Leaving, But 'Fake News' is a Part of All Our Lives Now | Opinion - Newsweek - November 30th, 2020
- Concerns over Thanksgiving gatherings continue as U.S. marks deadliest day in pandemic in months - Yahoo News - November 30th, 2020
- Will Biden administration be a repeat of Obama years? - Yahoo News - November 30th, 2020
- Fontana Residents 'Fed Up' With Possible Thanksgiving Day Planned Power Outages - Yahoo News - November 30th, 2020
- The Next Administration Should Bring the Shadow Wars into the Light - Defense One - November 26th, 2020
- Dan and Ray's traditional Thanksgiving meal will be curbside - Yahoo News - November 26th, 2020
- Thanksgiving 2020 At Home: Reasons We're Thankful - Yahoo News - November 26th, 2020
- Invisible campaign and the specter of socialism: Why Cuban Americans fell hard for Trump - Tampa Bay Times - November 26th, 2020
- Eagles fans, experts split on what to do with Carson Wentz - Yahoo News - November 26th, 2020
- The Damage Of Trumps International Anti-Abortion Policy Wont Be Easy To Undo - HuffPost - November 26th, 2020
- Painting the town: Murals meet the moment | Oregon ArtsWatch - Oregon ArtsWatch - November 11th, 2020
- Jill Biden: a chance to transform the role of first lady - FRANCE 24 - November 11th, 2020
- The Dem Hid From a Scandal. The Republican Attended Super-Spreader Events. Guess Who Racked up the Votes? - Mother Jones - November 11th, 2020
- Trump probably 'cant steal the election' but here's why you should be 'alarmed' anyway: conservative - AlterNet - November 11th, 2020
- The Trump Era Is Over. Our Leaders Want To Take Us Back To 2015 - Jacobin magazine - November 11th, 2020
- Opinion: The future of Fintech marketing - ETBrandEquity.com - November 11th, 2020
- Biden sleepwalks to the White House - Spectator.co.uk - November 11th, 2020
- Letters to the Editor 11/5/20 | Letters to the Editor | Bend - The Source Weekly - November 5th, 2020
- Florida Democrats Assess What Went Wrong For Biden With Latinos in the State - Newsweek - November 5th, 2020
- Whats at stake in Arizonas 2020 election - Cronkite News - November 5th, 2020