Boris Johnsons government has a few distractions at the moment, and, though there is the occasional glimpse of official process, the Integrated Review of Security, Defence, Development & Foreign Policy that will define Brexit Britains place in the world is clearly not top of the Prime Ministers To Do list. That said, the amalgamation last month of the Foreign Office and the unloved Department for International Development into the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office does rather predispose the outcome of the development and foreign policy parts of the review. Whether this was red meat to Tory backbenchers or an arbitrary and grandstanding Cummings/Johnson intervention need not detain us because the Chief of the Defence Staff, General Sir Nick Carter, has given us a taster of what is to come and we should pay some attention to what he has said.
In a speech delivered last week at the Policy Exchange think tank, Carter outlined a world that could have been drawn from the pages of recent works by contemporary observers like Sean McFate (Goliath), David Kilcullen (The Dragons & The Snakes) or, indeed, theArticle (28 June 2019 & 21 May 2020), where the west is playing strategic catch up. Carter contends that China, drawing on atavistic wisdom, and Russia, drawing on bitter experience, have reached the same conclusion: that to fight the west aka America in conventional battle is a mugs game and that imaginative forms of engagement must be developed to transform both the battlefield and what we understand as war.
As a result, and while the wests eye was off the ball in Afghanistan and Iraq, both countries have developed sophisticated techniques to fuse all instruments of national power an incomplete list would include restrictive trade practices, economic entryism, terrorism, cyberwar, lawfare and fake news to contest simultaneously the physical, virtual and cognitive realms of global engagement in a state of intense competition, short of war. The aim is to always seek marginal tactical advantage which, when taken in aggregate, can produce a strategic outcome.
Central to this view of conflict is the concept of a threshold. Above the threshold exists war in a conventional sense, where advantage still lies with the west and is a place our competitors have no wish to go, at least for now. The threshold itself is constantly, but prudently, tested to explore the boundaries of western tolerance. Below the threshold lies a Hobbesian world of perpetual, insidious and ambivalent conflict where surrogates dispense physical violence, trolls and hackers dispense digital violence, state policies like the Chinese Belt and Road initiative offer economic entrapment and there is an unending battle for narrative dominance.
China and Russia have two significant advantages in operating in this new environment. First, they have built the doctrine from the bottom up rather than having to adapt existing conventional structures; it is a custom build rather than a clumsy modification of an existing design. And second, all powerful state bureaucracies have the inherent advantage of being able to direct organs of both the state and civil society with far greater facility than checked and balanced western democracies. The examples of China and Huawei or Russia and the Wagner Group (a private security company essentially mercenaries widely deployed in Syria and elsewhere) make this clear. Late to the party but at least aware of these tectonic shifts in the nature of conflict, the British government has published its own Fusion Doctrine guidelines, but they remain very much aspirational targets rather than a functioning model.
Why has fusion become such a dominant theme? The answer is that it has been dominant since the 4th Century BC but the elements that now need to be fused are more numerous and more disparate. Alexanders army became invincible because it combined in mutually supporting manoeuvre the Companion Cavalry, the heavy infantry phalanx and the light infantry Agrianian skirmishers. In the same way, the Napoleonic system of independent corps manoeuvre or the manner in which the British in 1918 finally cracked industrial warfare by coordinating the infantry, artillery and aviation combat arms with logistic agility are illustrations of the fusion challenges of their day. Today, we are adequate practitioners of joint warfare the ability to operate in the traditional domains of land, sea and air complemented with a limited capacity to operate in the cyber and space domains. But we are way off the pace in combining that with other instruments of national power to create a fully fused effect; at the moment, our opponents possess a decisive advantage.
So what are the chances of closing the gap and is it worth the effort? The very fact that the Chief of Defence Staff can offer such an acute summary of the terms of strategic engagement is a good sign, but he and his fellow Whitehall principals have at least three fundamental challenges to meet as they try to address security fusion.
The first is that the machinery of government will need to be completely transformed to accommodate fusion. The existing state architecture has reasonably functioning military, cyber-security and intelligence silos but no mechanism to link the highest level of the executive function of government with each of these independent capabilities, along with the host of other instruments that exist in civil society as well as under state control.
Shaking up Whitehall is clearly a task this government is pursuing with missionary zeal, but this transformation is several orders of magnitude beyond the sacking of a handful of permanent secretaries. It is possible to create real strategic fusion, as the evidence of the world wars of the 20th Century attests. We did not outfight Germany twice between 1914 and 1945 but we did make a better fist of industrial production, scientific research, the coordination of intelligence and the creation of alliances: strategy trumps tactics and strategy is fusions child. Whether this historic vocation for creating fused effect in wars of national survival can be transferred to the less compelling circumstances of permanent sub-threshold conflict remains to be seen; certainly, this governments response to the current strategic threat of Covid-19 does little to inspire confidence.
The second challenge is one of transition. As has already been observed, China and Russia conceived a doctrine and then built the capabilities to prosecute it. By contrast, we have sets of existing capabilities to which we are trying to retro-fit a doctrine. The danger here is that in replacing old metal stuff with new digital stuff we fall between the two stools and create capabilities that are unable to properly discharge the functions of either traditional warfare or 21st Century conflict.
The final challenge is to address the scandalous legacy of recent defence procurement that has left Britain barely capable of meeting traditional security assumptions, let alone taking on a radical new construct. Two examples will suffice to make the point. The British armys capacity to fight on a high intensity battlefield is based around its main battle tank Challenger 2 and its infantry fighting vehicle, Warrior. It has been clear for the last two decades that Challenger 2 is clapped out, and, more recently, that Warrior has been worked to death in Afghanistan and Iraq. Yet, despite 430m spent on scoping a Warrior replacement alone, the British army has neither a main battle tank or an infantry fighting vehicle that it can go confidently to war with today, and with no replacements in sight. So, when there is speculation in the press that the army may abandon tanks altogether, it is less an imaginative doctrinal leap than an admission of material realism.
While the army has failed in procurement terms, the Royal Navy has been recklessly successful. Reckless in the sense that its main capital platforms the Queen Elizabeth class aircraft carriers and the future Dreadnought class of Trident missile carrying submarines have bent the procurement programme completely out of shape and produced surface ships that would not survive a real fight and a one shot nuclear deterrent completely reliant on the improbable assumption that technology will not be able to render the oceans transparent during the 50-year operating life of the platforms. Cleaning the Augean Stables of defence procurement would be the lifes work of any Chief of Defence Staff, Defence Secretary or Prime Ministerial advisor.
What emerges from the cursory review is that a series of procedural and material hurdles stand between where we are today and where the Chief of Defence Staff wants us to be, but even that observation does not address the core issue: is it actually worth the effort? Against a background of disintegrating public finances and the competing claims of health, social care and economic regeneration why not abandon the delusion of the global big league and just settle for a contribution to Nato, policing our fishing grounds and dispensing some developmental largesse? That, of course, would fail the manifest destiny of Global Britain but it is a discussion that must be taking place somewhere in Whitehall, right now.
See the original post:
Somewhere in Whitehall a defence review is taking place - TheArticle
- 6 Things New York Attorneys Need To Know About The New Surrogacy Law - Above the Law - February 16th, 2021
- Is Scarlet Witch Really In Control? Every Theory | Screen Rant - Screen Rant - February 11th, 2021
- The third wave that pushed Irish hospitals to the brink - RTE.ie - February 11th, 2021
- Candidates, Experts Discuss Potential Positives and Pitfalls of Ranked-Choice Voting Amid New York City Implementation - Gotham Gazette - February 4th, 2021
- One Year Of Fight Against Coronavirus, Has India Passed Its Peak? What To Expect Now, Dr Randeep Guleria Explains | Coronavirus Outbreak - Swachh... - February 4th, 2021
- Surrogacy reform is spreading in the rich world - The Economist - January 31st, 2021
- As teams prepare for Super Bowl Sunday, CDC says NFL's COVID-19 mitigation strategies are effective - Yahoo! Voices - January 31st, 2021
- The unregulated, All-Star-driven world of open enrollment loopholes in Texas high school football - The Dallas Morning News - January 15th, 2021
- The Twitter presidency is over. Or is it? - Vox.com - January 15th, 2021
- Peaceful transition of power is the American dream right now - Modern Diplomacy - December 28th, 2020
- News industry must seize opportunity restore trust | TheHill - The Hill - December 18th, 2020
- The GOP Hopes This Issue Will Tarnish Warnock's Pastor Image - The Daily Beast - December 18th, 2020
- The real US failure when it comes to globalization is not having a 21st century, social safety net - The Times of India Blog - December 18th, 2020
- Prevent your guacamole from browning with this airtight container - Yahoo! Voices - December 18th, 2020
- How Trump Won One of America's Most Diverse Counties By a Lot - POLITICO - December 14th, 2020
- Gwen Stefani and Blake Shelton holding off on wedding due to COVID-19 - Yahoo News Canada - December 14th, 2020
- Trump May Be Leaving, But 'Fake News' is a Part of All Our Lives Now | Opinion - Newsweek - November 30th, 2020
- Concerns over Thanksgiving gatherings continue as U.S. marks deadliest day in pandemic in months - Yahoo News - November 30th, 2020
- Will Biden administration be a repeat of Obama years? - Yahoo News - November 30th, 2020
- Fontana Residents 'Fed Up' With Possible Thanksgiving Day Planned Power Outages - Yahoo News - November 30th, 2020
- The Next Administration Should Bring the Shadow Wars into the Light - Defense One - November 26th, 2020
- Dan and Ray's traditional Thanksgiving meal will be curbside - Yahoo News - November 26th, 2020
- Thanksgiving 2020 At Home: Reasons We're Thankful - Yahoo News - November 26th, 2020
- Invisible campaign and the specter of socialism: Why Cuban Americans fell hard for Trump - Tampa Bay Times - November 26th, 2020
- Eagles fans, experts split on what to do with Carson Wentz - Yahoo News - November 26th, 2020
- The Damage Of Trumps International Anti-Abortion Policy Wont Be Easy To Undo - HuffPost - November 26th, 2020
- Painting the town: Murals meet the moment | Oregon ArtsWatch - Oregon ArtsWatch - November 11th, 2020
- Jill Biden: a chance to transform the role of first lady - FRANCE 24 - November 11th, 2020
- The Dem Hid From a Scandal. The Republican Attended Super-Spreader Events. Guess Who Racked up the Votes? - Mother Jones - November 11th, 2020
- Trump probably 'cant steal the election' but here's why you should be 'alarmed' anyway: conservative - AlterNet - November 11th, 2020
- The Trump Era Is Over. Our Leaders Want To Take Us Back To 2015 - Jacobin magazine - November 11th, 2020
- Opinion: The future of Fintech marketing - ETBrandEquity.com - November 11th, 2020
- Biden sleepwalks to the White House - Spectator.co.uk - November 11th, 2020
- Letters to the Editor 11/5/20 | Letters to the Editor | Bend - The Source Weekly - November 5th, 2020
- Florida Democrats Assess What Went Wrong For Biden With Latinos in the State - Newsweek - November 5th, 2020
- Whats at stake in Arizonas 2020 election - Cronkite News - November 5th, 2020
- HOW DUVAL SHAPED PAST ELECTIONS: Why Jacksonville is critical to winning the presidency - FirstCoastNews.com WTLV-WJXX - November 5th, 2020
- Jill Biden: A Chance To Transform The Role Of First Lady - NDTV - November 5th, 2020
- Election 2020 Live Blog - 90.5 WESA - November 5th, 2020
- 2020 Watch: Is Biden remaking the Democratic coalition? - Minneapolis Star Tribune - November 1st, 2020
- HOW DUVAL SHAPED PAST ELECTIONS: Why Jacksonville is critical to winning the presidency - The Florida Times-Union - November 1st, 2020
- How Joe Biden May Have Outmaneuvered Donald Trump On Energy, Climate, and the Economic Recovery - TIME - November 1st, 2020
- Presidential race shaping up to be tight in northern Maine - CBC.ca - November 1st, 2020
- Kamala Harris Urges Democrats To Keep Their Foot On The Pedal In Late Texas Visit - Patch.com - November 1st, 2020
- Emo-truthful Trump-Biden 2020: another post-truth election | OUPblog - OUPblog - November 1st, 2020
- Early Voting May Change the Impact of Last Week Blitz Campaigning - WOUB - October 29th, 2020
- Lagging in the Polls, Trump Team Predicts Win Based on 'Enthusiasm' - Newsweek - October 25th, 2020
- Network, GPS Will Be Jammed In Project Convergence 2021 - Breaking Defense - October 25th, 2020
- Surrogate Carrying Twins Shocked When Parents Say They No Longer Want The Babies - BabyGaga - October 25th, 2020
- Biden needs Black voters to turn out better than '16, in Florida and across nation - Sarasota Herald-Tribune - October 25th, 2020
- Trump vs. Biden: Here's how every region of the state plays its part in the race - Detroit Free Press - October 25th, 2020
- Weekly jobless claims fall to 787K | TheHill - The Hill - October 25th, 2020
- Wisconsin Democrats Are Organizing Like Mad. Will It Be Enough? - Vanity Fair - October 25th, 2020
- How Fox News analyst Arnon Mishkin will call the election - Los Angeles Times - October 25th, 2020
- My Wild 2 Weeks Inside the Trump Campaign Bubble - POLITICO - October 25th, 2020
- A burning planet: Why we must learn to live with fire - National Observer - October 25th, 2020
- Will Americans vote against Trump's behavior or for his achievements? | TheHill - The Hill - October 25th, 2020
- Salem 'Witch City' Massachusetts to triple fines over Halloween weekend amid coronavirus pandemic | TheHill - The Hill - October 25th, 2020
- Queensland election: has Palaszczuk helped defeat the politics of gender? - The Guardian - October 25th, 2020
- It's time to end employment discrimination for people with disabilities | TheHill - The Hill - October 25th, 2020
- Akufo-Addo Is The Most Serious Threat To Our Country And Democracy - We Change Him On December 7 Or We Suffer - Modern Ghana - October 25th, 2020
- Trumps top health official lies and says the US is doing as well as the rest of the world on COVID - AlterNet - October 25th, 2020
- Strategist on stimulus: the market has already priced it in - Yahoo Money - October 25th, 2020
- Cooper and Forest clash over masks, schools, and COVID-19 response in NC Governor debate - The Fayetteville Observer - October 16th, 2020
- Trump needs North Carolina in 2020 election, but the swing state is a toss-up - Citizen Times - October 16th, 2020
- 'All hands on deck': Stabenow works to build another blue wave in Michigan - Michigan Advance - October 16th, 2020
- Tom Stevenson In the Grey Zone: Proxy Warfare LRB 22 October 2020 - London Review of Books - October 16th, 2020
- Gentlemen against Trump - The Week - October 16th, 2020
- Battleground state of Wisconsin clashes over Trump and beyond - Anadolu Agency - October 16th, 2020
- Trump barely won Pennsylvania in 2016. His 2020 election may depend on keeping this swing state. - The Times - October 16th, 2020
- Air Force to Test Weapons Swarming Software in October - Air Force Magazine - September 23rd, 2020
- Improvised Mode: The Army Network Evolves In Project Convergence - Breaking Defense - September 23rd, 2020
- Biden Will Beat Expectations in the First Debate - Election Central - September 23rd, 2020
- On the trail: Visits part of Trump push in key battleground state - Concord Monitor - September 21st, 2020
- What's causing Western wildfires and how to stop them | TheHill - The Hill - September 21st, 2020
- Office working was already on the way out, Covid-19 has just hastened its end - iNews - September 21st, 2020
- Putin is about to turn his attention to the American way of life | TheHill - The Hill - September 21st, 2020
- Does the DHS Whistleblower Report Reveal an Election Interference Scandal? - Lawfare - September 21st, 2020
- Obituary of the Supreme Court justice - Sports Grind Entertainment - September 21st, 2020
- Buying power: Author warns democracy is for sale as parties put a price on influence and access bought and sold - The Sunday Post - September 21st, 2020