STASI: Surrogate moms are celebrity incubators – New York Daily News

NEW YORK DAILY NEWS

Friday, June 23, 2017, 4:04 PM

Surrogacy is the new slavery: womb slavery.

The latest celebrity to hire a personal broodmare (after having two children naturally) is the newly black Kim Kardashian.

Surrogacy the method by which rich or at least well-off couples hire women who generally arent in the same financial stratosphere to carry their babies to gestation is now the designer way to birth.

Take Kimye, who are rich beyond you/our/their wildest dreams. Wouldnt the moral thing for them to do especially after having two children naturally would be adoption?

Kim Kardashian sheds light on blackface controversy

In the U.S.,there are about 400,000 kids in the foster system with 100,000 of them waiting, praying, to be adopted.

But then again, what kind of parent thinks that having film crews around recording their every move for the world to see, makes for a healthy home environment for kids?

Worse, right off, why would any couple, fast on the heels of a husbands public mental breakdown, bring yet another child into the world?

Isnt that the first thing troubled people are told in marital counseling?

Kim Kardashians beauty line made $14M within hours of launch

Rule: Kids dont heal your personal crazy.

But back to surrogacy, which becomes front page every time yet another celebrity hires a brood mare.

Lets be honest: pretending that carrying anothers child a huge leap from the old-time, rich lady wet nurse is not a financial deal pure and simple. It is, frankly, a lie pure and simple.

A woman who carries a strangers babies to gestation for money isnt no matter how they blog about it in it strictly for altruistic reasons. No matter what they say.

Kim Kardashian spends $379G for Jackie Kennedys watch

Oh, right, what about those who carry and give birth to babies for family members without compensation? Weird.

Yes, I know, politically incorrect!

Maybe, but at least its honest. How do you carry a baby, give it birth, and hand your newborn to your sister like some 19th century out-of-wedlock woman hiding the shame of her pregnancy? How do you do it without sorrow; without natural maternal feelings erupting afterwards?

And then, who are you to that baby? Mother? Aunt? Friend?

Kim Kardashian reportedly hires surrogate for third child

Its like a scene out of Chinatown: My mother, my aunt, my friend, my cousin.

And heres a reality check: A surrogate must take hormones and drugs, which in and of itself are not what a healthy woman would otherwise do.

Then theres the surrogates emotional side, which rich couples looking for surrogates should seriously consider.

105 photos view gallery

Whether its your fertilized eggs or Kim Kardashians, the reality is that a bond develops inside the womb between a mommy and child. This despite the surrogate knowing from the get-go that when she gives birth, shell be handing this life to people with whom shes made a cash bargain.

Kim Kardashian, Caitlyn Jenner have not spoken in several months

Postnatal depression and even grieving is not uncommon following surrogate motherhood, according to Healthguidance.org

But then why should a couple with bucks worry about someone elses emotional state after theyeve paid her to give you what you want?

And were not talking about small change. Rich Chinese women are reportedly paying American surrogacy agencies $150,000 for surrogates. In India, its become a national shame with the spread of surrogacy among poor women.

In the U.S., intended parents should expect to spend between $98,000 to $140,000, according to Conceivability.cam.

Its womb slavery for willing and sometimes desperate women to provide children for the rich and wanting.

Maybe thats why New York doesnt allow residents to become surrogates.

Whatever the reason, its nothing more than The Handmaid's Tale without the hats.

Follow this link:
STASI: Surrogate moms are celebrity incubators - New York Daily News

Related Post

Comments are closed.